Individuals may be satisfied when seeking to buy Dianabol due to the cheaper price range compared to other anabolic steroids . Methandrostenolone is extremely popular due to its cost to benefit ratio, and among laboratories it is known as a fairly cheap compound to manufacture. Therefore, prices on the market are steadily similar (even between pharmaceutical grade and UGL). The large price differences, however, will pretty much only be seen between in-person ‘gym floor’ prices and many internet website prices (which consists of websites that do not set minimum order limits). Individuals must remember that price is also dependent on the concentration of drug per tablet (for example, Dianabol can be found in the following mg per tablet: 5mg, 10mg, 50mg, and 100mg). It is because of this that price description can become difficult, and so for the purpose of listing common pricing here, it will be done as price per mg as opposed to the usual listings of price-per-tablet. In-person prices of Dianabol can be found in the range of $1 – $ per 50mg ($ – $ per 1mg). Internet sources that do not restrict buyers to minimum order amounts typically sell Dbol in the more expensive range for approximately $ per 50mg ($ per 1mg). Pharmaceutical grade Dianabol commonly falls into this general price range online (for example, Anabol by British Dispensary).
In November 1942, the Italian cyclist Fausto Coppi took "seven packets of amphetamine" to beat the world hour record on the track.  In 1960, the Danish rider Knud Enemark Jensen collapsed during the 100 km team time trial at the Olympic Games in Rome and died later in hospital. The autopsy showed he had taken amphetamine and another drug, Ronicol , which dilates the blood vessels. The chairman of the Dutch cycling federation, Piet van Dijk, said of Rome that "dope – whole cartloads – [were] used in such royal quantities." 
Actually, Ms. Williams, this is a news site where the venting is moderated to the best of the moderators limited time.
As you note in your post, this is not black-and-white science. Experts can clearly disagree because from all the literature I’ve read on tramadol in dogs (and there isn’t much as I’m sure you discovered), there appear to be a lot of variables – from breed to individual – involved in how tramadol metabolizes, and that is before one gets into the variables of hydration and physiological stress on dehydrated animals operating at the limits of their physical capabilities.
I don’t profess to be an expert, but I’m not an idiot either.
Questions as to your motivations in getting involved – as with questions as to my motivations or opinions or whatever in reporting on anything – are valid. I, in fact, consider them important feedback. It is possible for any of us to be blinded by emotion. If someone thinks I’m having that problem, I’m glad to have them make the argument.
This case is not simple. It’s complicated.
I’d certainly enjoy moderating a discussion between you and Morrie Craig if you two wanted to have such a discussion. My gut feeling since the beginning of this has been that the tramadol was most likely administered in the Nome dog lot by someone associated with the Seaveys to help the dogs rest, but Dallas Seavey denied that from the get go.
I pushed Craig rather hard on why he couldn’t narrow the window for the time of administration. He made some rather sound arguments for why he thought that would be a scientific stretch too far. I won’t get into those because I’d like to revisit the dog yard where I have a very specific question you might be able to answer: